Hi Luiz, The style check was modified recently,so we are not sure about this particular license warning. Can you provide some guidance here? Thanks, Miao On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:28 PM <bluez.test.bot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is automated email and please do not reply to this email! > > Dear submitter, > > Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. > While we are preparing for reviewing the patches, we found the following > issue/warning. > > Test Result: > checkpatch Failed > > Outputs: > WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > #94: FILE: src/adv_monitor.c:1: > +/* > > WARNING:SPDX_LICENSE_TAG: Missing or malformed SPDX-License-Identifier tag in line 1 > #247: FILE: src/adv_monitor.h:1: > +/* > > - total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 235 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > Your patch has style problems, please review. > > NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > > > --- > Regards, > Linux Bluetooth
