Re: Should we disable ERTM as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yun-hao,

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:43 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Yun-hao,
>
> > When I ran the following tests in PTS qualification on Chrome OS, I
> > couldn’t pass all of them because they all failed to create an AVDTP
> > connection with channel type as ‘Streaming’ or ‘Enhanced
> > Retransmission’.
> >
> > - MPS/AG-SRC-TG/HFAV/CLH/SD/BV-03-I
> > - MPS/AG-SRC-TG/HFAV/CLH/SD/BV-04-I
> > - MPS/AG-SRC-TG/HFAV/CLH/SD/BV-05-I
> > - MPS/AG-SRC-TG/HFAV/CLH/SD/BV-06-I
> >
> > It looks like bluez doesn’t want to change its mode even though it
> > claims it supports them. Our question is do we still want to enable
> > this feature as default?

We don't use ERTM on AVDTP connections, in fact only AVRCP Browsing
channel requires that but I guess you want low level testing of L2CAP
parameters it more common to use l2test instead, or this does not come
from L2CAP test spec?

> I am a bit confused. So when you use the disable_ertm kernel parameters, these test pass? But ERTM is mandatory for AVRCP 1.3 and later.
>
> Are we sure that MPS test cases are correct? I mean, we never required ERTM for HFP since that is based on RFCOMM and ERTM is useless for RFCOMM.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux