Hi Marcel, After giving it more thought, I would like to propose that this additional property corresponds with Device Type as defined in Generic Access Profile: As stated in Bluetooth Core Specification Version 5.2, Vol 3, Part C (Generic Access Profile): This profile defines three device types based on the supported Core Configurations as defined in [Vol 0] Part B, Section 3.1. The device types are shown in Table 1.1: * BR/EDR * LE only * BR/EDR/LE Therefore, to be as close to the spec as possible, I propose that the property be named GAPDeviceType, and the possible values be "br/edr", "le-only", "br/edr/le". What do you think? Thanks for reviewing this proposal! On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:51 PM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Sonny, > > > Thanks for the feedback, Marcel. Will come back with the modified > > patches based on your suggestions. > > I also meant to write that the name “Bearer” might not be the best either. I am open for suggestions. Also if it is an array, it needs to be plural of course. If we start exposing BR/EDR vs LE or its combination (and we might also consider HS even while not used these days), then we need to be consistent with our terminology across the APIs. > > Regards > > Marcel >
