Hey Marcel,
I was working on other changes and didn't get a chance to come back to
this yet. I will be working on this refactoring this week so please
expect another patch series by the end of the week.
Thanks
Abhishek
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:29 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> >>> When suspending, update the event filter for BR/EDR devices and the
> >>> whitelist for LE devices. BR/EDR devices are added to the event filter
> >>> and will auto-connect if found during suspend. For LE, we update the
> >>> filter to remove everything that is not wakeable during suspend.
> >>> Finally, we disconnect all connected devices and wait for that to
> >>> complete before returning in the suspend notifier.
> >>>
> >>> An example suspend flow with 1 BR/EDR HID device, 1 BR/EDR audio device,
> >>> 1 LE HID device, 1 LE non-HID (where HIDs are wakeable):
> >>>
> >>> PM_PREPARE_SUSPEND:
> >>> - Set event filter for BR/EDR HID device
> >>> - Clear anything from LE whitelist that is not wakeable
> >>> - Add (if not there) the LE HID device
> >>> - Disconnect all devices
> >>
> >> is this really the right order? Why not disconnect all devices first. We are suspending after all, so lets disconnect first and then create the appropriate accept filters.
> >>
> >> I have the feeling it would also make the overall logic a lot simpler since it fits more into the current model that is used internally for a lot of decision points (especially with LE).
> >>
> >>> PM_POST_SUSPEND:
> >>> - Clear event filter
> >>> - Restore LE whitelist (deleting anything not in le_pend_conn or
> >>> le_pend_report and then adding from those lists)
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> * Refactored filters and whitelist settings to its own patch
> >>> * Refactored update_white_list to have clearer edge cases
> >>> * Add connected devices to whitelist (previously missing corner case)
> >>>
> >>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 17 +-
> >>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 5 +
> >>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 28 ++-
> >>> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >>> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c | 8 +
> >>> 5 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >>> index 6293bdd7d862..720d8e633f7e 100644
> >>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> >>> @@ -932,10 +932,14 @@ struct hci_cp_sniff_subrate {
> >>> #define HCI_OP_RESET 0x0c03
> >>>
> >>> #define HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT 0x0c05
> >>> -struct hci_cp_set_event_flt {
> >>> - __u8 flt_type;
> >>> - __u8 cond_type;
> >>> - __u8 condition[0];
> >>> +#define HCI_SET_EVENT_FLT_SIZE 9
> >>> +struct hci_cp_set_event_filter {
> >>> + __u8 flt_type;
> >>> + __u8 cond_type;
> >>> + struct {
> >>> + bdaddr_t bdaddr;
> >>> + __u8 auto_accept;
> >>> + } __packed addr_conn_flt;
> >>> } __packed;
> >>>
> >>> /* Filter types */
> >>> @@ -949,8 +953,9 @@ struct hci_cp_set_event_flt {
> >>> #define HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR 0x02
> >>>
> >>> /* CONN_SETUP Conditions */
> >>> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF 0x01
> >>> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON 0x02
> >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF 0x01
> >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON 0x02
> >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON_WITH_RS 0x03
> >>>
> >>> #define HCI_OP_READ_STORED_LINK_KEY 0x0c0d
> >>> struct hci_cp_read_stored_link_key {
> >>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>> index 74d703e46fb4..49eae4a802ac 100644
> >>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>> @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ struct discovery_state {
> >>> #define SUSPEND_NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */
> >>>
> >>> enum suspend_tasks {
> >>> + SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE,
> >>> + SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING,
> >>> +
> >>> SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER,
> >>> __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS
> >>> };
> >>> @@ -406,6 +409,8 @@ struct hci_dev {
> >>> struct work_struct suspend_prepare;
> >>> enum suspended_state suspend_state_next;
> >>> enum suspended_state suspend_state;
> >>> + int disconnect_counter;
> >>> + bool freeze_filters;
> >>>
> >>> wait_queue_head_t suspend_wait_q;
> >>> DECLARE_BITMAP(suspend_tasks, __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS);
> >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>> index 6ddc4a74a5e4..76d25b3f4c73 100644
> >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>> @@ -2474,6 +2474,7 @@ static void hci_inquiry_result_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>> {
> >>> struct hci_ev_conn_complete *ev = (void *) skb->data;
> >>> + struct inquiry_entry *ie;
> >>> struct hci_conn *conn;
> >>>
> >>> BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
> >>> @@ -2482,14 +2483,29 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>>
> >>> conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr);
> >>> if (!conn) {
> >>> - if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK)
> >>> - goto unlock;
> >>> + /* Connection may not exist if auto-connected. Check the inquiry
> >>> + * cache to see if we've already discovered this bdaddr before.
> >>> + * Create a new connection if it was previously discovered.
> >>> + */
> >>> + ie = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup(hdev, &ev->bdaddr);
> >>> + if (ie) {
> >>> + conn = hci_conn_add(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr,
> >>> + HCI_ROLE_SLAVE);
> >>> + if (!conn) {
> >>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "no memory for new conn");
> >>> + goto unlock;
> >>> + }
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK)
> >>> + goto unlock;
> >>
> >> We are not going to get SCO_LINK auto-connected and thus we should really have it done just for ACL links. I don’t have good proposal to structure this handling at the moment, but we need to clean this up a bit.
> >
> > Ack, will look deeper into this.
> >
> >>
> >>> - conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK, &ev->bdaddr);
> >>> - if (!conn)
> >>> - goto unlock;
> >>> + conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK,
> >>> + &ev->bdaddr);
> >>> + if (!conn)
> >>> + goto unlock;
> >>>
> >>> - conn->type = SCO_LINK;
> >>> + conn->type = SCO_LINK;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> if (!ev->status) {
> >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >>> index 08908469c043..c930b9ff1cfd 100644
> >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> >>> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@
> >>> #define HCI_REQ_PEND 1
> >>> #define HCI_REQ_CANCELED 2
> >>>
> >>> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND 0x1
> >>> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA 0x2
> >>> +
> >>> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW 0x0012
> >>> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL 0x0060
> >>> +
> >>> void hci_req_init(struct hci_request *req, struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>> {
> >>> skb_queue_head_init(&req->cmd_q);
> >>> @@ -654,6 +660,12 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> {
> >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> >>>
> >>> + /* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend*/
> >>
> >> Please fix the coding style for comments. Extra space required between suspend and */
> >>
> >> I also have the feeling that we should split BR/EDR from LE support. I think we can merge the BR/EDR support quicker since it is a lot simpler. Especially when it stands on its own.
> >
> > Ack. I kept them merged because I didn't want to change the request
> > completion function but I can separate them.
> >
> >>
> >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters) {
> >>> + BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend");
> >>> + return;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> if (use_ext_scan(hdev)) {
> >>> struct hci_cp_le_set_ext_scan_enable cp;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -670,23 +682,67 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static void add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> >>> - struct hci_conn_params *params)
> >>> +static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> >>> + u8 bdaddr_type)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp;
> >>> +
> >>> + cp.bdaddr_type = bdaddr_type;
> >>> + bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, bdaddr);
> >>> +
> >>> + BT_DBG("Remove %pMR (0x%x) from whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type);
> >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +/* Adds connection to white list if needed. On error, returns -1 */
> >>> +static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> >>> + struct hci_conn_params *params, u8 *num_entries,
> >>> + u8 flags)
> >>> {
> >>> struct hci_cp_le_add_to_white_list cp;
> >>> + struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> >>> + bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA);
> >>> + bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> >>>
> >>> + /* Already in white list */
> >>> + if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list, ¶ms->addr,
> >>> + params->addr_type))
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> >>> + if (*num_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size)
> >>> + return -1;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> >>> + if (!allow_rpa &&
> >>> + hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type)) {
> >>> + return -1;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + /* During suspend, only wakeable devices can be in whitelist */
> >>> + if (suspend && !hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, ¶ms->addr,
> >>> + params->addr_type))
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + *num_entries += 1;
> >>> cp.bdaddr_type = params->addr_type;
> >>> bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, ¶ms->addr);
> >>>
> >>> + BT_DBG("Add %pMR (0x%x) to whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type);
> >>> hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> >>> +
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> +static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags)
> >>> {
> >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> >>> struct hci_conn_params *params;
> >>> struct bdaddr_list *b;
> >>> - uint8_t white_list_entries = 0;
> >>> + u8 white_list_entries = 0;
> >>> + bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA);
> >>> + bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> >>> + bool wakeable, pend_conn, pend_report;
> >>>
> >>> /* Go through the current white list programmed into the
> >>> * controller one by one and check if that address is still
> >>> @@ -695,26 +751,42 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> * command to remove it from the controller.
> >>> */
> >>> list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->le_white_list, list) {
> >>> - /* If the device is neither in pend_le_conns nor
> >>> - * pend_le_reports then remove it from the whitelist.
> >>> + wakeable = !!hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type);
> >>> + pend_conn = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns,
> >>> + &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type);
> >>> + pend_report = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports,
> >>> + &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* During suspend, we remove all non-wakeable devices
> >>> + * and leave all others alone. Connected devices will be
> >>> + * disconnected during suspend but may not be in the pending
> >>> + * list yet.
> >>> */
> >>> - if (!hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns,
> >>> - &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type) &&
> >>> - !hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports,
> >>> - &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> >>> - struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp;
> >>> -
> >>> - cp.bdaddr_type = b->bdaddr_type;
> >>> - bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr);
> >>> -
> >>> - hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST,
> >>> - sizeof(cp), &cp);
> >>> - continue;
> >>> - }
> >>> + if (suspend) {
> >>> + if (!wakeable) {
> >>> + del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type);
> >>> + continue;
> >>> + }
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + /* If the device is not likely to connect or report,
> >>> + * remove it from the whitelist.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (!pend_conn && !pend_report) {
> >>> + del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type);
> >>> + continue;
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> >>> /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> >>> - return 0x00;
> >>> + if (!allow_rpa &&
> >>> + hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr,
> >>> + b->bdaddr_type)) {
> >>> + return 0x00;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> white_list_entries++;
> >>> @@ -731,47 +803,30 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> * white list.
> >>> */
> >>> list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_conns, action) {
> >>> - if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list,
> >>> - ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type))
> >>> - continue;
> >>> -
> >>> - if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) {
> >>> - /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags))
> >>> return 0x00;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr,
> >>> - params->addr_type)) {
> >>> - /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> >>> - return 0x00;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> - white_list_entries++;
> >>> - add_to_white_list(req, params);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> /* After adding all new pending connections, walk through
> >>> * the list of pending reports and also add these to the
> >>> - * white list if there is still space.
> >>> + * white list if there is still space. Abort if space runs out.
> >>> */
> >>> list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_reports, action) {
> >>> - if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list,
> >>> - ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type))
> >>> - continue;
> >>> -
> >>> - if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) {
> >>> - /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags))
> >>> return 0x00;
> >>> - }
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr,
> >>> - params->addr_type)) {
> >>> - /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> >>> - return 0x00;
> >>> + /* Currently connected devices will be missing from the white list and
> >>> + * we need to insert them into the whitelist if they are wakeable. We
> >>> + * can't insert later because we will have already returned from the
> >>> + * suspend notifier and would cause a spurious wakeup.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (suspend) {
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->le_conn_params, list) {
> >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries,
> >>> + flags))
> >>> + return 0x00;
> >>> }
> >>> -
> >>> - white_list_entries++;
> >>> - add_to_white_list(req, params);
> >>> }
> >>
> >> This goes to my point above. If we just disconnect everything, then the white list programming should be easily. Everything that is pending and have been elected for wakeup + incoming connection will be added. And then we are done. I don’t think much has to change except one extra check if wakeup is allowed or not.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> /* Select filter policy to use white list */
> >>> @@ -861,11 +916,26 @@ static void hci_req_start_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 type, u16 interval,
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> +void __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags)
> >>> {
> >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> >>> u8 own_addr_type;
> >>> u8 filter_policy;
> >>> + u8 window, interval;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* We allow whitelisting even with RPAs in suspend. In the worst case,
> >>> + * we won't be able to wake from devices that use the privacy1.2
> >>> + * features. Additionally, once we support privacy1.2 and IRK
> >>> + * offloading, we can update this to also check for those conditions.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND)
> >>> + flags |= LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend */
> >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters) {
> >>> + BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend");
> >>> + return;
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> /* Set require_privacy to false since no SCAN_REQ are send
> >>> * during passive scanning. Not using an non-resolvable address
> >>> @@ -881,7 +951,8 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> * happen before enabling scanning. The controller does
> >>> * not allow white list modification while scanning.
> >>> */
> >>> - filter_policy = update_white_list(req);
> >>> + BT_DBG("Updating white list with flags = %d", flags);
> >>> + filter_policy = update_white_list(req, flags);
> >>>
> >>> /* When the controller is using random resolvable addresses and
> >>> * with that having LE privacy enabled, then controllers with
> >>> @@ -896,8 +967,22 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> (hdev->le_features[0] & HCI_LE_EXT_SCAN_POLICY))
> >>> filter_policy |= 0x02;
> >>>
> >>> - hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, hdev->le_scan_interval,
> >>> - hdev->le_scan_window, own_addr_type, filter_policy);
> >>> + if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND) {
> >>> + window = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW;
> >>> + interval = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL;
> >>
> >> I think we just want this done via some hdev->suspended variable or similar.
> >
> > In support of setting a separate flag, it is easier to grep for when a
> > specific flag is being used and passed to a function than it is to
> > check when a variable is being set in a global context variable.
> >
> >>
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + window = hdev->le_scan_window;
> >>> + interval = hdev->le_scan_interval;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + BT_DBG("LE passive scan with whitelist = %d", filter_policy);
> >>> + hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, interval, window,
> >>> + own_addr_type, filter_policy);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> +{
> >>> + __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, 0);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
> >>> @@ -918,6 +1003,76 @@ static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
> >>> return adv_instance->scan_rsp_len;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static void hci_req_clear_event_filter(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f;
> >>> +
> >>> + memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f));
> >>> + f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CLEAR_ALL;
> >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, 1, &f);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Update page scan state (since we may have modified it when setting
> >>> + * the event filter).
> >>> + */
> >>> + __hci_req_update_scan(req);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void hci_req_set_event_filter(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct bdaddr_list *b;
> >>> + struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f;
> >>> + struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> >>> + int filters_updated = 0;
> >>> + u8 scan;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Always clear event filter when starting */
> >>> + hci_req_clear_event_filter(req);
> >>> +
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->wakeable, list) {
> >>> + if (b->bdaddr_type != BDADDR_BREDR)
> >>> + continue;
> >>> +
> >>> + memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f));
> >>> + bacpy(&f.addr_conn_flt.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr);
> >>> + f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CONN_SETUP;
> >>> + f.cond_type = HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR;
> >>> + f.addr_conn_flt.auto_accept = HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON;
> >>> +
> >>> + BT_DBG("Adding event filters for %pMR", &b->bdaddr);
> >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, sizeof(f), &f);
> >>> +
> >>> + filters_updated++;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> If we would use the wakeable list just for BR/EDR then the filters_updated++ would become redundant and we could just check if the list is empty.
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + scan = filters_updated ? SCAN_PAGE : SCAN_DISABLED;
> >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE, 1, &scan);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(struct hci_request *req,
> >>> + u8 flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> + /* Can't change params without disabling first */
> >>> + hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(req);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Configure params and enable scanning */
> >>> + __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, flags);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Block suspend notifier on response */
> >>> + set_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, req->hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void le_suspend_req_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status, u16 opcode)
> >>> +{
> >>> + BT_DBG("Request complete opcode=0x%x, status=0x%x", opcode, status);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Expecting LE Set scan to return */
> >>> + if (opcode == HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE &&
> >>> + test_and_clear_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE,
> >>> + hdev->suspend_tasks)) {
> >>> + wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> >>> + }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /* Call with hci_dev_lock */
> >>> void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next)
> >>> {
> >>> @@ -932,6 +1087,44 @@ void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next)
> >>>
> >>> hdev->suspend_state = next;
> >>>
> >>> + hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> >>> + if (next == BT_SUSPENDED) {
> >>> + /* Enable event filter for existing devices */
> >>> + hci_req_set_event_filter(&req);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Enable passive scan at lower duty cycle */
> >>> + hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> >>> +
> >>> + hdev->freeze_filters = true;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Run commands before disconnecting */
> >>> + hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete);
> >>> +
> >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter = 0;
> >>> + /* Soft disconnect everything (power off)*/
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(conn, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) {
> >>> + hci_disconnect(conn, HCI_ERROR_REMOTE_POWER_OFF);
> >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter++;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) {
> >>> + BT_DBG("Had %d disconnects. Will wait on them",
> >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter);
> >>> + set_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >>> + }
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + hdev->freeze_filters = false;
> >>> +
> >>> + hci_req_clear_event_filter(&req);
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Reset passive/background scanning to normal */
> >>> + hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, 0);
> >>> +
> >>> + hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + hdev->suspend_state = next;
> >>> +
> >>> done:
> >>> clear_bit(SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >>> wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> >>> @@ -2034,6 +2227,9 @@ void __hci_req_update_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> >>> if (mgmt_powering_down(hdev))
> >>> return;
> >>>
> >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters)
> >>> + return;
> >>> +
> >>> if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_CONNECTABLE) ||
> >>> disconnected_whitelist_entries(hdev))
> >>> scan = SCAN_PAGE;
> >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> >>> index 58468dfa112f..269ce70e501c 100644
> >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> >>> @@ -7451,6 +7451,14 @@ void mgmt_device_disconnected(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> >>>
> >>> mgmt_event(MGMT_EV_DEVICE_DISCONNECTED, hdev, &ev, sizeof(ev), sk);
> >>>
> >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) {
> >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter--;
> >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter <= 0) {
> >>> + clear_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> >>> + wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>
> >> I think this disconnect_counter is a bit racy. I would rather check that our connection hash is empty.
> >>
> >> In addition, I have the feeling we better disable LE scanning BR/EDR page scan first. So that we clearly do not have any artifacts of accidental incoming connections.
> >>
> >> The first step when going to suspend should clean the house
> >>
> >> 1) Set a flag that all BR/EDR and LE connection attempts are rejected
> >> 2) Disable BR/EDR page scan
> >> 3) Disable LE advertising
> >> 2) Disable LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry
> >> 4) Disconnect all
> >>
> >> Now we have a clean house and we now prepare for wakeup triggers
> >>
> >> 1) Clear flag and allow incoming connection
> >> 2) Set BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed
> >> 3) Set LE whitelist and enable scanning if needed
> >>
> >> When we wake up, then we also just need to reset the filters
> >>
> >> 1) Clear BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed
> >> 2) Update LE white and enable scanning if needed
> >> 3) Restore LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry
> >>
> >
> > I think this is reasonable so I will try to implement it. Might take
> > me a couple of days (traveling out of country) so expect the next
> > patch series early next week.
>
> I just wanted to quickly check if you run into any troubles with the changes?
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
