Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: avoid unused function warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arnd,

>>> The btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout() function is used inside of an
>>> ifdef, leading to a warning when this part is hidden
>>> from the compiler:
>>> 
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c:530:13: error: unused function 'btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>> 
>>> Use an IS_ENABLED() check instead so the compiler can see
>>> the code and then discard it silently.
>>> 
>>> Fixes: d7ef0d1e3968 ("Bluetooth: btusb: Use cmd_timeout to reset Realtek device")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> index a9c35ebb30f8..23e606aaaea4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>>> @@ -3807,8 +3807,8 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>>              btusb_check_needs_reset_resume(intf);
>>>      }
>>> 
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL
>>> -     if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK) {
>>> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL) &&
>>> +         (id->driver_info & BTUSB_REALTEK)) {
>>>              hdev->setup = btrtl_setup_realtek;
>>>              hdev->shutdown = btrtl_shutdown_realtek;
>>>              hdev->cmd_timeout = btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout;
>>> @@ -3819,7 +3819,6 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>>               */
>>>              set_bit(BTUSB_WAKEUP_DISABLE, &data->flags);
>>>      }
>>> -#endif
>> 
>> I prefer that we stick another ifdef around the btusb_rtl_cmd_timeout function since that
>> is how we did it for the other vendors as well.
> 
> Ok. Can you just commit that with 'Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>'?
> 
>> However I start to wonder if we need all these vendor ifdef anyway. The vendor specific
>> functions should turn into empty stubs if their support is not selected.
> 
> It just wastes a little bit of object code space, which my approach
> above avoids.
> 
> I guess one could also be clever and redefine those macros like
> 
> #define BTUSB_REALTEK (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BT_HCIBTUSB_RTL) ? 0x20000 : 0)
> 
> so the if() section gets silently dropped, in addition to treating
> zero like BTUSB_IGNORE.

we could do that as well. I just want it to be consistent in the code.

Regards

Marcel




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux