Brian, On 08/29, Gix, Brian wrote: > > Anyway, I think a better approach would be to submit patches to ELL > > implementing these two features, and then use these additions in meshd. > > Does that sound acceptable from your POV? > > I still feel though, that you are trying to solve a pre-deployment > “debugging” issue by requiring DBus responses for messages that don’t > require them. I think you're right. Let's drop this patch, and I'll try to come up with something that would cover only "important" methods you mentioned earlier. regards -- Michał Lowas-Rzechonek <michal.lowas-rzechonek@xxxxxxxxxxx> Silvair http://silvair.com Jasnogórska 44, 31-358 Krakow, POLAND
