Hi Harish,
On 2019-04-30 21:08, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:27:33PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on bluetooth-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on next-20190429]
[cannot apply to v5.1-rc7]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note
to help improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Matthias-Kaehlcke/Bluetooth-btqca-inject-command-complete-event-during-fw-download/20190430-125407
base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git
master
config: xtensa-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.0
reproduce:
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
-O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=8.1.0 make.cross ARCH=xtensa
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c: In function
'qca_inject_cmd_complete_event':
>> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c:286:18: error: 'QCA_HCI_CC_SUCCESS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'QCA_HCI_CC_OPCODE'?
skb_put_u8(skb, QCA_HCI_CC_SUCCESS);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
QCA_HCI_CC_OPCODE
drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c:286:18: note: each undeclared identifier
is reported only once for each function it appears in
vim +286 drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
267
268 static int qca_inject_cmd_complete_event(struct hci_dev *hdev)
269 {
270 struct hci_event_hdr *hdr;
271 struct hci_ev_cmd_complete *evt;
272 struct sk_buff *skb;
273
274 skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*evt) + 1,
GFP_KERNEL);
275 if (!skb)
276 return -ENOMEM;
277
278 hdr = skb_put(skb, sizeof(*hdr));
279 hdr->evt = HCI_EV_CMD_COMPLETE;
280 hdr->plen = sizeof(*evt) + 1;
281
282 evt = skb_put(skb, sizeof(*evt));
283 evt->ncmd = 1;
284 evt->opcode = HCI_OP_NOP;
285
> 286 skb_put_u8(skb, QCA_HCI_CC_SUCCESS);
Oh, I changed it in my tree, but somehow missed to include this file
in the commit ...
I'll fix it in the next version. Since I expect the change to remain
controversial I'll wait a bit for other comments before sending out
v9.
Thanks
Matthias
[Bala]: can you check whether this change is applicable for wcn3998 as
well.
@Matthias, Thanks Matthias for taking Up :)
--
Regards
Balakrishna.
