On Friday 01 February 2019 14:43:53 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi Pali, Pasi,
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:09 PM Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 30 January 2019 10:15:17 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:54:48PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday 23 January 2019 18:46:18 Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Pali,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > tools/parser/avdtp.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/parser/avdtp.c b/tools/parser/avdtp.c
> > > > > > > index 18569c895..a21410f5a 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/tools/parser/avdtp.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/tools/parser/avdtp.c
> > > > > > > @@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ static char *vndcodec2str(uint32_t vendor, uint16_t vndcodec)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > if (vendor == 0x0000004f && vndcodec == 0x0001)
> > > > > > > return "aptX";
> > > > > > > + else if (vendor == 0x0000000a && vndcodec == 0x0001)
> > > > > > > + return "FastStream";
> > > > > > > + else if (vendor == 0x0000000a && vndcodec == 0x0002)
> > > > > > > + return "aptX Low Latency";
> > > > > > > + else if (vendor == 0x000000d7 && vndcodec == 0x0024)
> > > > > > > + return "aptX HD";
> > > > > > > else if (vendor == 0x0000012d && vndcodec == 0x00aa)
> > > > > > > return "LDAC";
> > > > > > > return "Unknown???;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lets keep the focus on btmon support since nobody should be using hcidump anymore.
> > > > >
> > > > > In btmon I already implemented it and patches are now merged. I just
> > > > > found another place where this capability parsing is implemented and
> > > > > based on fact that users still use hcidump I quickly looked at it and
> > > > > implemented this parsing.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree, hcidump still comes up on many places (guides, blogs, mailinglist posts, etc),
> > > > so it makes sense to add these patches to hcidump aswell. Especially when the patch is quite small.
> > >
> > > Exactly, people still use hcidump...
> >
> > Well it is a deprecated tool which we might remove starting on BlueZ
> > 6.x which we would like to do in the very next release, if that
> > doesn't happen than perhaps Id take these patches in for a very last
> > BlueZ 5.x release.
> >
> > @Marcel: Or you have a better plan? We could do one last 5.x and then
> > start working on removing the deprecated tools/etc.
> >
>
> +1 for doing one last 5.x release before deprecating and removing tools etc!
Ok, what is the plan? If hcidump is not going to be deleted in upcoming
release, can you take this patch?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
