Hi Matthias, >>>> void bt_sock_reclassify_lock(struct sock *sk, int proto); >>>> >>>> +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr); >>> >>> Maybe change the API name to start with bt_ and get rid of device_? >> >> device_ indicates that we get the BD_ADDR for a 'struct device' and >> not for e.g. a 'struct fwnode_handle'. >> >> Anyway with this version of the patch fwnode_get_bd_address() has been >> scrapped and it might never be introduced again, so I'm open to change >> the name to bt_ if there is a general preference for it. > > Marcel, can you live with this being added to the Bluetooth code base > instead of property? Also if you'd prefer the function to be named > bt_get_bd_address() let me know. explain to me again why this is useful? I am failing to see the benefit if this is not part of the property.h API. Regards Marcel
