Hi Marcel, please let me know if any changes are needed to get this patch applied to bluetooth-next. Thanks Matthias On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:33:38AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:13:05AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:47:06PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > On 9/27/2018 12:41 PM, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote: > > > > void bt_sock_reclassify_lock(struct sock *sk, int proto); > > > > > > > > +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr); > > > > > > Maybe change the API name to start with bt_ and get rid of device_? > > > > device_ indicates that we get the BD_ADDR for a 'struct device' and > > not for e.g. a 'struct fwnode_handle'. > > > > Anyway with this version of the patch fwnode_get_bd_address() has been > > scrapped and it might never be introduced again, so I'm open to change > > the name to bt_ if there is a general preference for it. > > Marcel, can you live with this being added to the Bluetooth code base > instead of property? Also if you'd prefer the function to be named > bt_get_bd_address() let me know. > > Cheers > > Matthias
