On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
>> The newly added btintel_download_firmware() dummy helper definition is
>> incorrect, causing a build error when CONFIG_BT_INTEL is disabled:
>>
>> In file included from drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c:49:0:
>> drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h:196:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token
>> drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h:193:19: error: 'btintel_download_firmware' declared 'static' but never defined [-Werror=unused-function]
>>
>> Removing the semicolon makes it work again.
>>
>> Fixes: 0bd4ded3287d ("Bluetooth: btintel: Create common function for firmware download")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h
>> index 01728e212267..41c642cc523f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.h
>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static inline int btintel_read_boot_params(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>>
>> static inline int btintel_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *dev,
>> const struct firmware *fw,
>> - u32 *boot_param);
>> + u32 *boot_param)
>> {
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> }
>
> didn’t I fix this before sending the pull request? Can you check against
> net-next tree that this is still an issue?
It's fixed in net-next. I looked at linux-next, which apparently had an
older version of the commit when Stephen pulled the tree into today's
linux-next, through bluetooth-next.git#master.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
