Hi Marcel, Luiz,
On Sunday 06 March 2016 16:34:53 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Szymon,
> >
> >> This interfaces will provide per tranport capabilities of remote
> >> devices. Eventually leading to deprecation of Device1 interface.
> >
> > so I not like the naming DeviceClassic1 and DeviceSmart1 at all. Nobody
> > uses these terms widely that they are easily recognizable and can be
> > associated. I also do not want to follow Bluetooth SIG marketing and logo
> > terms. They might change and then we are stuck with it.
> IMO they are better than LE and BR/EDR, but perhaps you have something
> better in mind. Btw, this does bring the question if we should do
> something similar to the Adapter interface, although there are a
> little less conflicts because there more LE specific interfaces.
DeviceLE1 and DeviceBR{EDR}1 ?
Or maybe Device2 (that would be BREDR only) and DeviceLE1 ?
--
pozdrawiam
Szymon Janc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
