Re: [RFC] doc: Add DeviceClassic1 and DeviceSmart1 interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel,

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Szymon,
>
>> This interfaces will provide per tranport capabilities of remote
>> devices. Eventually leading to deprecation of Device1 interface.
>
> so I not like the naming DeviceClassic1 and DeviceSmart1 at all. Nobody uses these terms widely that they are easily recognizable and can be associated. I also do not want to follow Bluetooth SIG marketing and logo terms. They might change and then we are stuck with it.

IMO they are better than LE and BR/EDR, but perhaps you have something
better in mind. Btw, this does bring the question if we should do
something similar to the Adapter interface, although there are a
little less conflicts because there more LE specific interfaces.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux