On Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:37:22 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi John, > > >>> This is similar to the "bcm43xx" option but using the kernel > >>> driver has the advantage that the wakeup and shutdown pins on the > >>> device can be used. > >> > >> what is wrong with just using btattach? > > > > It's marked as experimental and not installed by "make install", so > > I assumed that it was only supposed to be used for testing. > > hmm, not installed by default. I don't think there's any way to install it via the autotools infrastructure since it's added to noinst_PROGRAMS in Makefile.tools (and then only when EXPERIMENTAL is set). > I do not remember the reason for that, > but I am sure I had one. However btattach is so dead simple that it > should be used. Seems like we should look into making sure the > command line options are stable and we install it by default. I'm happy to submit a patch to build (and install) btattach by default, but I guess it will also need a man page. I'm not sure what you mean about the command line options, they look reasonable to me but I'm not a bluetooth expert. Regards, John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
