Hi Michael,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/29/2015 01:57 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>>
>> It will probably get applied, no reason to get neurotic on the weekend
>> no one said we would not take it, so please be patience.
>
>
> I'm not following you here. What are you trying to say?
I though you were the same guy sending the patch, nevermind we have a
fix already.
>> It is a fix to uuid: Add bt_uuid_to_le since the convention is to define
>> 128 bit UUIDs as big endian which then need to be swaped regardless of
>> endianess.
>
>
> The commit doesn't change anything though. Please revert it or fix it to not
> have a conversion or precision loss. If you need help I will make a patch.
uint128_t is a byte array:
typedef struct {
uint8_t data[16];
} uint128_t;
There is no precision loss.
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
