Thanks Antonio for useful advice! > -----Original Message----- > From: Antonio Ospite [mailto:ao2@xxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 5:22 PM > To: Vikrampal > Cc: 'Luiz Augusto von Dentz'; linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Dmitry > Kasatkin' > Subject: Re: AVCTP and AVRCP packet decoder file structure in btmon > > On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:24:44 +0530 > Vikrampal <vikram.pal@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Sure Luiz! > > > > However, I've one more small doubt. If I'm submitting a series of > > patches Such as 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4... I guess in such scenarios no > > need to ensure that the patches separately compiles. What we need to > > ensure is that all the patches together gets compiled properly. Am I > mistaken? > > > > Make sure that sub-sequences of a series produce sensible code. > > The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4 applied. > The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4 and 2/4 applied. > The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 applied. > The code should $VALIDATE with 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4 applied. > > The definition of VALIDATE can vary project by project or feature by feature; > the minimum requirement should be that compilation always succeeds. > > You can use something like: > > git rebase -i --exec "make" some_parent_branch > > to test that compilation passes after each commit. > > Ciao, > Antonio > > -- > Antonio Ospite > http://ao2.it > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Regards, Vikram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
