Sure Luiz! However, I've one more small doubt. If I'm submitting a series of patches Such as 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4... I guess in such scenarios no need to ensure that the patches separately compiles. What we need to ensure is that all the patches together gets compiled properly. Am I mistaken? > -----Original Message----- > From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz [mailto:luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 4:15 PM > To: Vikrampal > Cc: linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dmitry Kasatkin > Subject: Re: AVCTP and AVRCP packet decoder file structure in btmon > > Hi Vikrampal, > > We can start by reusing avctp.c to place AV/C and AVRCP decoders, later on > we can review if it is the case of splitting. Also please note that > android/Android.mk needs updating if we change anything on the build of > btmon. > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Vikrampal <vikram.pal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm working on AVRCP packet decoder for Bluetooth monitor module. > > There's a separate file avctp.c/h for AVCTP packet decoder. > > > > The file avctp.c is not a big file as such. So, I'm thinking whether > > or not I should include AVRCP decoder in this file itself. > > > > Shall I create a separate file for AVRCP decoding? > > > > If both AVCTP & AVRCP go in the same file then what should be the > > appropriate name of the file or shall I create a separate file for > > AVRCP as well. > > > > Please advise me. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Vikram > > > > > > -- > Luiz Augusto von Dentz Regards, Vikram -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
