Hi Johan, On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> What about the suggestion to make l2cap-tester check if LE CoC is >> enabled on the kernel and skip the the tests that depend on it? Right >> now, the tests simply fail which is misleading (at first I thought it >> was a regression). >> >> Another option is to change the test name to mention that they require >> enabling LE CoC. > > This has never bothered me much since the assumption is that mainly > developers would be running these tools and therefore know the > implications and requirements. I have a feeling that adding this kind of > checks might be a bit overkill, especially since this debugfs entry will > disappear as soon as we do one more test run at the UPF next week. After > that LE CoC support will always be there if you've got a new enough > kernel. If the are plans to have this option removed real soon, no problem for me then. Best Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo INdT - Manaus - Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
