Re: [PATCH BlueZ 0/2] Basic [sg]etsockopt() testing in l2cap-tester

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johan,

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I pushed your first patch and a slightly different version of the
> second one which is more thorough in its checks. I also sent fixes for
> the kernel side so you don't need to spend more time on that (unless you
> disagree with the fixes I sent).

Thanks! I looked at the patches and I have no comments. Will do tests
and report problems (if any).

What about the suggestion to make l2cap-tester check if LE CoC is
enabled on the kernel and skip the the tests that depend on it? Right
now, the tests simply fail which is misleading (at first I thought it
was a regression).

Another option is to change the test name to mention that they require
enabling LE CoC.

Best Regards,
-- 
Anderson Lizardo
INdT - Manaus - Brazil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux