Hi, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > >> However I do have a general question, do we need the new D-Bus API > >> if we do an auto-reconnect handling? If so, do we need to indicate > >> that the we are currently in auto-reconnect mode and/or cancel it > >> when connecting attempts via other means happen. > > > > We still need the new D-Bus API to let the UI know that it can't > > reconnect to the device because the device is not supposed to normally > > accept connections (ReconnectMode is "device" (or "none" if such a > > device exists)). This allows the UI to instruct the user to go and > > move the mouse to reconnect or press that hidden "connect" button in > > his device to reconnect it if the device had lost the pairing. If the > > ReconnectMode is "device", the meaning of Device1.Connected property > > changes a bit, since the fact that my mouse is disconnected right now > > doesn't mean that it is not working as intended or that it should be > > connected. > > I might have should answered this email with an acknowledged and > understood comment. Sorry about that. > > My original comment still stands. I am fine with this patch set, but > leave it up to Johan to make the final to apply it. No major issues from my side either. All patches in the set have now been applied. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html