Re: [RFC] Bluetooth: Add support for Intel Bluetooth device [8087:07dc]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel,

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > +	const u8		*patch_curr;
> > +	char			pfile[32];
> > +	u8			*m_off_code;
> > +
> > +	u8 m_on[] = { 0x01, 0x00 };
> > +	u8 m_off_1[] = { 0x00, 0x01 };
> > +	u8 m_off_2[] = { 0x00, 0x02 };
> 
> Shouldn't this be __u8. Johan, any preference. I know that I used __u8
> for the bcm92035 vendor command.

To my understanding __u8 (and __u16 and __u32 too) are intended for code
that's to be shared with user space (e.g. our upcoming uapi header
file(s)). Anything else should just use u8. At least this is what I
discovered after some research when I get more heavily involved with
kernel development a few years ago.

Johan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux