Hi, On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Luiz, >> >>> This adds a fallback for GetProperties method when it is not >>> implemented. >>> --- >>> This set of patches are workarounds to old properties interface to be able to >>> test new code until other components are ported. >> >> I am not sure I want this at all. This is a nasty hack. >> >> Especially since interfaces that previously had neither or only some of >> these methods get these methods. Bad idea. It might work inside BlueZ >> where we always added these methods, but in other projects some of these >> methods had been left out since the properties where send via signals >> with the object path being announced. > > Yep, I fully agree this is not meant to be upstream (only perhaps > behind a compilation flag or something like that), also this does not > work with clients which do use the introspection data like dbus-python > because the fallback methods are not part of it the python scripts > will just fail. Actually it does work with our test scripts for some reason. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
