Hi Jesse, > >> >> load_firmware will be called at the end of hci_dev_open() if it > >> >> is defined. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <jesse.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> --- > >> >> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 + > >> >> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 2 ++ > >> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h > >> >> index 593cd1d..40972a3 100644 > >> >> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h > >> >> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h > >> >> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct hci_dev { > >> >> int (*send)(struct sk_buff *skb); > >> >> void (*notify)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int evt); > >> >> int (*ioctl)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); > >> >> + void (*load_firmware)(struct hci_dev *hdev); > >> >> }; > >> >> > >> >> struct hci_conn { > >> >> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> >> index d4de5db..49be87a 100644 > >> >> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> >> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c > >> >> @@ -725,6 +725,8 @@ int hci_dev_open(__u16 dev) > >> >> done: > >> >> hci_req_unlock(hdev); > >> >> hci_dev_put(hdev); > >> >> + if (!ret && hdev->load_firmware) > >> >> + hdev->load_firmware(hdev); > >> >> return ret; > >> >> } > >> >> > >> > > >> > has anybody thought this through actually? Do we need to reload the > >> > firmware after every HCI_Reset? Since hci_dev_open() is used at least > >> > twice during normal operation. And for every RFKILL or power down/up > >> > cycle of the chip. > >> > > >> > And there is an internal process of hci_dev_open() trigger on > >> > registration and others triggered by hciconfig hci0 up. I am pretty much > >> > against having to wait for all this firmware loading crap during every > >> > bring up of the device. Especially since it always does a trip via > >> > request_firmware(). > >> > >> In the second patch, firmware loading would be done only once per > >> power cycle of the chip. Since I think it should be the device driver, not hci, > >> who knows when and how to load firmware, the lock is placed in btusb.c. > > > > and how does the driver knows these details? That makes no sense. How > > does the driver know it got rebooted? > > > > The hci_dev_open() will start the transport. And as I explained before, > > that can happen twice during boot time. > > Please take a look at the second part of this patchset, which is in patch 2/2. > Loading firmware is needed when the chip is rebooted, and a reboot would trigger > a probe in btusb. So btusb can know a firmware loading is needed whenever > a new patchram device is probed. And the load_firmware callback in > btusb would do > test_and_set_bit to ensure that the loading process would only be done once. that is horrible hackish. So NAK from my side. Look at what I told the Intel guys to do on supporting their USB dongle. You have the same problem and I want it solved in a similar way. The probe() callback is actually not a good idea either btw. It is for binding a driver. Binding and unbinding the driver has nothing to do with reboot of the device. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html