Re: [PATCH v2 resend 1/2] Introduced a load_firmware callback to struct hci_dev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marcel,

2012/10/4 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Jesse,
>
>> load_firmware will be called at the end of hci_dev_open() if it
>> is defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen-chien Jesse Sung <jesse.sung@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |    1 +
>>  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c         |    2 ++
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> index 593cd1d..40972a3 100644
>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
>> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct hci_dev {
>>       int (*send)(struct sk_buff *skb);
>>       void (*notify)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int evt);
>>       int (*ioctl)(struct hci_dev *hdev, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
>> +     void (*load_firmware)(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>>  };
>>
>>  struct hci_conn {
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> index d4de5db..49be87a 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
>> @@ -725,6 +725,8 @@ int hci_dev_open(__u16 dev)
>>  done:
>>       hci_req_unlock(hdev);
>>       hci_dev_put(hdev);
>> +     if (!ret && hdev->load_firmware)
>> +             hdev->load_firmware(hdev);
>>       return ret;
>>  }
>>
>
> has anybody thought this through actually? Do we need to reload the
> firmware after every HCI_Reset? Since hci_dev_open() is used at least
> twice during normal operation. And for every RFKILL or power down/up
> cycle of the chip.
>
> And there is an internal process of hci_dev_open() trigger on
> registration and others triggered by hciconfig hci0 up. I am pretty much
> against having to wait for all this firmware loading crap during every
> bring up of the device. Especially since it always does a trip via
> request_firmware().

In the second patch, firmware loading would be done only once per
power cycle of the chip. Since I think it should be the device driver, not hci,
who knows when and how to load firmware, the lock is placed in btusb.c.

Thanks,
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Bluez Devel]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Networking]     [Linux ATH6KL]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media Drivers]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux