Hi Gustavo,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 06:13:42PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/a2mp.h b/include/net/bluetooth/a2mp.h
> > index 012f573..8ba236c 100644
> > --- a/include/net/bluetooth/a2mp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/a2mp.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ struct amp_mgr {
> >
> > struct list_head phy_links;
> > struct mutex phy_links_lock;
> > +
> > + struct list_head amp_ctrls;
> > + struct mutex amp_ctrls_lock;
>
> Have you checked for RCU here, are they worthwhile? and why is it better than
> spinlocks? This is for both locks above.
I want to be able to sleep inside critical section and using RCU is
overkill here.
Best regards
Andrei Emeltchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
