Hi Bastien, > > >> and I still have all the rights to do so. > > >> > > >> As long as we are still based on GLib, this will stay as it is. I am > > >> not > > >> jumping through any hoops, because David wouldn't respect prior art. > > > > > > How exactly would would have called a D-Bus implementation in GLib? > > > > Well you could have called godbus as that is more a gobject binding > > than a pure glib/GMainLoop one. > > GLib lives in a single tarball. It's only Marcel's hate for GObject and > the apparent need to be able to replace glib that spawned this thin > wrapper on top of libdbus you're using now. plain fact is that our gdbus code was there first. If you wanna turn this into a GObject discussion now, then please find a mailing list that cares. It is clearly not this one. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
