Hi,
On 14:14 Thu 24 May, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> * Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-24 13:56:11 -0300]:
>
> > > >
> > > > +static void l2cap_sock_finalize_cb(void *data, int err)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct sock *sk = data;
> > >
> > > Why we cannot just use l2cap_sock_finalize_cb(struct sock *sk, int err)
> > > what is the reason for extra assignment?
> >
> > Because we want to be generic here, we don't know who else will use finalize()
> > so we need to keep a void * here.
> >
> > >
> > > I also think finalize is not good name since it does not mean what is
> > > actually finalized.
> >
> > And it is not, I failed to come with a better name here. The initial one was
> > delete, even worse.
>
> Maybe we can go with prepare_finalize() or prepare_close() here.
That sounds better, there's "teardown" too.
>
> Gustavo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
