Hi Johannes, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:28:09AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On 4/18/2012 11:36 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > >>>>No, this is incorrect. If one device wants to connect on one > >>>>channel, the other typically has to use the same channel. If one > >>>>device wants to scan, the other will be affected. Some hardware may > >>>>support switching around between two channels, but might also > >>>>support more than 2 virtual interfaces, so again they won't be > >>>>independent. > >>> > >>>BTW: which devices can switch channels? > >> > >>None today, I'm working on it. > > > >If this is not possible how people setup wireless hotspot using virtual > >interfaces and run wpa_supplicant and hostapd on each separately. > >Like here: > > > >http://linuxalfi.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/connectify-for-linux-with-single-wireless-interface/ > > Of course it's possible. Are you deliberately misunderstanding me? > > You cannot use more than one channel today. We are changing that. To > do good channel management, rather than hard-coding it in your > config, you want to run a single wpa_s controlling all interfaces. Can wpa_supplicant be an AP? I though that functionality is split to hostap and wpa_supplicant. Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
