Thanks for response. Previous version of my proposal presented dbus implementation. As vcgomes suggested yesterday during IRC conversation at #bluez-gsoc I've already fixed my proposal and now it's prepared for gobex library. I plan to implement fuse based solution, but your experience with gvfs might be helpful. Thanks, Michal On 4 April 2012 17:24, Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 16:38 +0200, dmp wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've submitted proposal [1] for "OBEX Filesystem In Userspace". I'll >> be grateful if someone could give me some comments. There are still >> few days to improve. >> >> [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/dmp/44002 > > FWIW, having written the ObexFTP gvfs backend twice already, that using > a D-Bus API is a bad idea. Instead, the code should use gobex directly. > It would make the code more robust, and easier to debug. > > I'm happy doing code reviews, or answer gvfs specific questions if those > crop up during the SoC project. > > Cheers > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
