Hi Ulisses, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:42:33PM -0200, Ulisses Furquim wrote: > Hi Andrei, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko > <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > There are several places in the code where l2cap_state_change and > > l2cap_chan_set_err used together. With combining them we remove > > socket lock in l2cap_send_disconn_req and simplify code in couple > > of other places with a price of adding extra parameter err to > > state_change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h | 3 +- > > net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > > net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 9 +++++- > > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > While I see the benefit of removing function calls and also some code > I'm not sure about this change now. We need to think of moving sock > handling to l2cap_sock.c and for that we may have to work more on > l2cap_ops indeed. However, we need to change ERTM state machine > handling first, I'd say. Yes, the main idea is to remove those socket operations to l2cap_ops so that other socket-less protocols would override it. Best regards Andrei Emeltchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html