Hi Santiago, On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Santiago Carot <sancane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In any case, I don't think the best solution is to provide a value for > Type for wich we don't have enough information to determine what it > is, I think that in the case in wich Type is really optional, the > value provided in the measurement should be optional too. Under this > case it would be better not to provide anything in the > MeasurementReceived callback instead of providing a invented (Body) > value. I will update the patch to do this. > > Regards Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia - INdT Manaus - Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
