Hi Joe, > > Why is this a good thing? > > It's more similar to the rest of the <foo>_<level> uses. > Other than that, it's a little smaller. > > > And in your patch we have bt_err not having \n\n in the end. > > There shouldn't be a newline at all with the > actual functions bt_err or bt_info except > at the uses. then you might wanna read your patch again ;) > This is the style used in pr_<level> so that > it becomes possible to use pr_cont. Since we don't have a bt_cont, I don't see why bother changing this right now. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
