On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 07:35 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Why is this a good thing? It's more similar to the rest of the <foo>_<level> uses. Other than that, it's a little smaller. > And in your patch we have bt_err not having \n\n in the end. There shouldn't be a newline at all with the actual functions bt_err or bt_info except at the uses. This is the style used in pr_<level> so that it becomes possible to use pr_cont. > Size numbers look good. So I am all for this, but not just in one big > patch. I think the size is more or less irrelevant. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
