Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Lucas De Marchi
<lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +static void append_variant(DBusMessageIter *iter, int type, void *val)
> +{
> + DBusMessageIter value;
> + char sig[2] = { type, '\0' };
> +
> + dbus_message_iter_open_container(iter, DBUS_TYPE_VARIANT, sig, &value);
> +
> + dbus_message_iter_append_basic(&value, type, val);
> +
> + dbus_message_iter_close_container(iter, &value);
> +}
There should be possible to use dict_append_entry(src/dbus-common.h)
here, isn't it?
> +static dbus_bool_t emit_setting_changed(DBusConnection *conn,
> + const char *path,
> + const char *interface,
> + const char *name,
> + int type, void *value)
> +{
> + DBusMessage *signal;
> + DBusMessageIter iter;
> +
> + signal = dbus_message_new_signal(path, interface, "SettingChanged");
> +
> + if (!signal) {
> + error("Unable to allocate new %s.SettingChanged signal",
> + interface);
> + return FALSE;
> + }
> +
> + dbus_message_iter_init_append(signal, &iter);
> +
> + dbus_message_iter_append_basic(&iter, DBUS_TYPE_STRING, &name);
> +
> + append_variant(&iter, type, value);
> +
> + return g_dbus_send_message(conn, signal);
> +}
> +
I wonder if the settings cannot use PropertyChanged instead?
--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
