Hi Mat, * Mat Martineau <mathewm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2011-05-19 09:58:04 -0700]: > > > On Thu, 19 May 2011, Suraj Sumangala wrote: > > >Hi Mat, > > > >On 5/19/2011 2:28 AM, Mat Martineau wrote: > >> > >>Gustavo, > >> > >>On Mon, 9 May 2011, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote: > >> > > ... snip ... > > >>> > >>>Isn't Extended Flow Specification a required feature for AMP? > >>>I haven't seen > >>>it in your implementation. > >> > >>Extended Flowspec is needed to create an L2CAP channel directly on > >>AMP, but the implementation you're looking at does not implement the > >>"create channel" feature. Channels are created on BR/EDR and moved > >>to AMP, which does not require extended flowspec. > >> > > > >Why don't we have to use EFS for channels moved from BDR? Is it > >because we assume that the QoS provided by AMP will be better than > >BDR? > > Only "Best Effort" is supported by this implementation so QoS is > equivalent on either controller type. EFS is optional when creating > channels on BR/EDR, and the spec does not require EFS when moving to > a Best Effort AMP link. We've extensively interop'd AMP channel > moves without EFS. Isn't EFS and Create Channel Command required to the qualification? In PTS when AMP Support and AMP Manager Channel are enabled tests for Create Channel and EFS are also enabled. -- Gustavo F. Padovan http://profusion.mobi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
