On Thu, 19 May 2011, Suraj Sumangala wrote:
Hi Mat,
On 5/19/2011 2:28 AM, Mat Martineau wrote:
Gustavo,
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
... snip ...
Isn't Extended Flow Specification a required feature for AMP? I haven't
seen
it in your implementation.
Extended Flowspec is needed to create an L2CAP channel directly on
AMP, but the implementation you're looking at does not implement the
"create channel" feature. Channels are created on BR/EDR and moved
to AMP, which does not require extended flowspec.
Why don't we have to use EFS for channels moved from BDR? Is it because we
assume that the QoS provided by AMP will be better than BDR?
Only "Best Effort" is supported by this implementation so QoS is
equivalent on either controller type. EFS is optional when creating
channels on BR/EDR, and the spec does not require EFS when moving to a
Best Effort AMP link. We've extensively interop'd AMP channel moves
without EFS.
--
Mat Martineau
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
