Hi Xiao, On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:06 PM Robin Candau <antiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/11/23 17:27, Xiao Yao wrote: > > From: Xiao Yao <xiaoyao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > According to BLUETOOTH CORE SPECIFICATION Version 5.4 | Vol 3, > Part H, 2.4.24/2.4.25, The LE LTK and BR/EDR link keys can be > converted between each other, so the addr type can be either > BREDR or LE, so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Yao <xiaoyao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/adapter.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/adapter.c b/src/adapter.c > index 86fff72bc..ee70b00d2 100644 > --- a/src/adapter.c > +++ b/src/adapter.c > @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static GSList *conn_fail_list = NULL; > > struct link_key_info { > bdaddr_t bdaddr; > + uint8_t bdaddr_type; > unsigned char key[16]; > uint8_t type; > uint8_t pin_len; > @@ -3964,7 +3965,9 @@ static bool is_blocked_key(uint8_t key_type, uint8_t *key_value) > return false; > } > > -static struct link_key_info *get_key_info(GKeyFile *key_file, const char *peer) > +static struct link_key_info *get_key_info(GKeyFile *key_file, const char *peer, > + uint8_t bdaddr_type) > + > { > struct link_key_info *info = NULL; > char *str; > @@ -3976,6 +3979,7 @@ static struct link_key_info *get_key_info(GKeyFile *key_file, const char *peer) > info = g_new0(struct link_key_info, 1); > > str2ba(peer, &info->bdaddr); > + info->bdaddr_type = bdaddr_type; > > if (!strncmp(str, "0x", 2)) > str2buf(&str[2], info->key, sizeof(info->key)); > @@ -4343,7 +4347,7 @@ static void load_link_keys(struct btd_adapter *adapter, GSList *keys, > struct link_key_info *info = l->data; > > bacpy(&key->addr.bdaddr, &info->bdaddr); > - key->addr.type = BDADDR_BREDR; > + key->addr.type = info->bdaddr_type; > key->type = info->type; > memcpy(key->val, info->key, 16); > key->pin_len = info->pin_len; > @@ -4598,14 +4602,18 @@ static void load_conn_params(struct btd_adapter *adapter, GSList *params) > btd_error(adapter->dev_id, "Load connection parameters failed"); > } > > -static uint8_t get_le_addr_type(GKeyFile *keyfile) > +static uint8_t get_addr_type(GKeyFile *keyfile) > { > uint8_t addr_type; > char *type; > > + /* The AddressType is written to file only When dev->le is > + * set to true, as referenced in the update_technologies(). > + * Therefore, When type is NULL, it default to BDADDR_BREDR. > + */ > type = g_key_file_get_string(keyfile, "General", "AddressType", NULL); > if (!type) > - return BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC; > + return BDADDR_BREDR; > > if (g_str_equal(type, "public")) > addr_type = BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC; > @@ -4914,9 +4922,9 @@ static void load_devices(struct btd_adapter *adapter) > g_clear_error(&gerr); > } > > - key_info = get_key_info(key_file, entry->d_name); > + bdaddr_type = get_addr_type(key_file); > > - bdaddr_type = get_le_addr_type(key_file); > + key_info = get_key_info(key_file, entry->d_name, bdaddr_type); > > ltk_info = get_ltk_info(key_file, entry->d_name, bdaddr_type); > > > Hello, > > It seems like the above commit introduced a regression where the initial auto-connect for Bluetooth devices doesn't work anymore. > > Indeed, at system startup, starting a Bluetooth device will cause it to go in a "connected/disconnected" state loop, requiring to initialize a manual connection first (with sometimes multiple attempts needed) before getting it connected correctly and working as intended. > > `systemctl status bluetooth` reports the following error: > > [...] > déc. 15 11:03:18 Arch-Desktop bluetoothd[592]: Failed to load link keys for hci0: Invalid Parameters (0x0d) > [...] > > I bisected the bug with `git bisect` and it pointed out this commit [1] as the "faulty" one. > I can confirm that reverting it solves the issue. > > I reported this bug including details in the GitHub repo [2]. > > I remain available if any additional information are needed. > > [1] https://github.com/bluez/bluez/commit/d5536e0cd431e22be9a1132be6d4af2445590633 > [2] https://github.com/bluez/bluez/issues/686 > > -- > Regards, > Robin Candau / Antiz Perhaps related to: https://github.com/bluez/bluez/issues/875#issuecomment-2311100872? -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz