On 4/24/24 11:05 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 25/04/2024 00:01, Wren Turkal wrote:
3) only care about the case property enable-gpios is not configured,
the original BT driver design logic indeed matches with binging spec's
requirements before bartosz's wrong change
What? There is no such case according to bindings. I told you already
two times: Either change bindings or this is not valid.
@krzysztof, I'm curious. There is no entry in the binding specifically
for qca6390. Should there be?
qca6390 is documented in the bindings, but you are right that it lacks
if:then: entry narrowing/choosing specific supplies and pins. It should
have one, indeed.
Would creating an entry for the qca6390 hardware fix the issue you are
worried about?
Again, sorry for all the, what I assume are, basic questions. I am so
far out of my depth here. I am just trying to figure out how to move
forward. I really do appreciate your guidance here.
--
You're more amazing than you think!