On 25/04/2024 00:01, Wren Turkal wrote: >>> >>> 3) only care about the case property enable-gpios is not configured, >>> the original BT driver design logic indeed matches with binging spec's >>> requirements before bartosz's wrong change >> >> What? There is no such case according to bindings. I told you already >> two times: Either change bindings or this is not valid. > > @krzysztof, I'm curious. There is no entry in the binding specifically > for qca6390. Should there be? qca6390 is documented in the bindings, but you are right that it lacks if:then: entry narrowing/choosing specific supplies and pins. It should have one, indeed. Best regards, Krzysztof
