On 4/24/2024 11:47 PM, quic_zijuhu wrote:
> On 4/24/2024 11:41 PM, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
>> Hi Quic_zijuhu,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:35 AM quic_zijuhu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/24/2024 11:31 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 5:30 PM quic_zijuhu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/24/2024 11:24 PM, quic_zijuhu wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/24/2024 10:52 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 16:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>>>>>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 24/04/2024 14:29, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> qcadev->susclk = devm_clk_get_optional(&serdev->dev, NULL);
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(qcadev->susclk)) {
>>>>>>>>> @@ -2355,10 +2360,13 @@ static int qca_serdev_probe(struct serdev_device *serdev)
>>>>>>>>> qcadev->bt_en = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&serdev->dev, "enable",
>>>>>>>>> GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
>>>>>>>>> if (IS_ERR(qcadev->bt_en)) {
>>>>>>>>> - dev_warn(&serdev->dev, "failed to acquire enable gpio\n");
>>>>>>>>> - power_ctrl_enabled = false;
>>>>>>>>> + dev_err(&serdev->dev, "failed to acquire enable gpio\n");
>>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(qcadev->bt_en);
>>>>>> please think about for QCA2066. if it is returned from here. BT will
>>>>>> not working at all. if you don't return here. i will be working fine
>>>>>> for every BT functionality.
>>>>> sorry, correct a type error, it is QCA6390 not QCA2066.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't matter. If enable-gpios is not there, gpiod_get_optional()
>>>> will return NULL and we will not return.
>>>>
>>> i think i need to explain more for my consider case.
>>> let me take QCA6390, if the property enable-gpios is configured.
>>> but IS_ERR(qcadev->bt_en) case happens, your change will do error
>>> return, so BT will not work at all
>>>
>>> but if you don't do error return, BT will working fine.
>>>
>>> so your fix is not right regarding QCA6390.
>>
>> Actually I'd say he is probably right with respect to DT because that
>> seems to require GPIO, we probably need a clearer way to differentiate
>> if a device is being set up via DT or not (btattach), in any case DT
>> is probably preferable thus why I went ahead and applied this one.
>>
> for QCA6390, i can confirm that enable-gpios is optional. it is bring-up
> by my team. i can confirm reporter's machine don't config the GPIO pin.
> DTS binding spec also don't mark it as required.
>
> that is why i change my changing from initial reverting the whole change
> to only focus on QCA6390 that is the machine reported the issue.
>
>
>>>> Bart
>>>>
>>>>>> NAK again by me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + if (!qcadev->bt_en)
>>>>>>>>> + power_ctrl_enabled = false;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This looks duplicated - you already have such check earlier.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's under a different switch case!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bartosz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
i find the change have been merged.
i think it is not good manner to merge change in this way even if i give
reasonable doubt
