Hi Johan, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We can't go ahead and change the behavior of existing libbluetooth > functions like that since it would break any applications relying on the > old behavior (without baswap). So this patch isn't acceptable upstream. I thought of this more like a bug because it doesn't make sense to me why there should be a function returning the string without swapping the bytes first. So I didn't think of this as breaking the API, but more like fixing a function that is not used because it produces incorrect results. Anyway, your explanation makes sense and I don't use this function so I am totally ok with that. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
