Hi Briglia, On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:59 PM, <anderson.briglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch implements new LE meta event in order to handle advertising > reports. > > Signed-off-by: Anderson Briglia <anderson.briglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > index 46438f4..5180555 100644 > --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h > @@ -980,6 +980,24 @@ struct hci_ev_le_conn_complete { > __u8 clk_accurancy; > } __packed; > > +#define ADV_IND 0x00 > +#define ADV_DIRECT_IND 0x01 > +#define ADV_SCAN_IND 0x02 > +#define ADV_NONCONN_IND 0x03 > +#define SCAN_RSP 0x04 > + > +#define ADDR_DEV_PUBLIC 0x00 > +#define ADDR_DEV_RANDOM 0x01 > + > +#define HCI_EV_LE_ADVERTISING_REPORT 0x02 > +struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info { > + __u8 evt_type; > + __u8 bdaddr_type; > + bdaddr_t bdaddr; > + __u8 length; > + __u8 data[0]; > +} __packed; > + > #define HCI_EV_LE_LTK_REQ 0x05 > struct hci_ev_le_ltk_req { > __le16 handle; > diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > index 99c75f4..987f5de 100644 > --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c > @@ -2498,6 +2498,25 @@ static inline void hci_le_ltk_request_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, > hci_dev_unlock(hdev); > } > > +static inline void hci_le_adv_report_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, > + struct sk_buff *skb) > +{ > + struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *ev; > + u8 num_reports, i; > + > + num_reports = (u8) skb->data[0]; I think this cast is unnecessary. > + > + ev = (struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *) (skb->data + 1); What about a slightly shorter line (well I didn't count the chars): ev = (struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *) &skb->data[1]; > + > + BT_DBG("adv from: %s", batostr(&ev->bdaddr)); > + > + for (i = 1; i < num_reports; i++) { > + ev = (struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *) > + (ev->data + ev->length + 1); > + BT_DBG("adv from: %s", batostr(&ev->bdaddr)); > + } What about (not sure if it is shorter, just a suggestion): ev = (struct hci_ev_le_advertising_info *) &ev->data[ev->length + 1]; > +} > + > static inline void hci_le_meta_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > { > struct hci_ev_le_meta *le_ev = (void *) skb->data; > @@ -2513,6 +2532,9 @@ static inline void hci_le_meta_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) > hci_le_ltk_request_evt(hdev, skb); > break; > > + case HCI_EV_LE_ADVERTISING_REPORT: > + hci_le_adv_report_evt(hdev, skb); > + missing a "break" here. > default: > break; > } > -- > 1.7.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Anderson Lizardo OpenBossa Labs - INdT Manaus - Brazil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html