Hi Anderson, On Wed, Dec 01, 2010, Anderson Lizardo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Gustavo F. Padovan > <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> -static int disable_esco = 0; > >> +static int disable_esco; > > > > I don't think this change is right. Can we be sure that disable_esco > > will be 0 by default? > > I think Andrei's patch is ok. IIRC kernel zeroes BSS on init, that's > why checkpatch.pl complains when you initialize it explicitely. That's interesting. It'd be nice to have some comment from Marcel on this since at least on the user space side it's considered a good thing to explicitly initialize static variables to zero. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
