Johan, ugh! I see the issues now. As you said - neither of those approaches would work for me since we need to conditionally handle the incoming connection really. Wonder if there is some design reason this was done i.e. hardcoding it in hci_event.c? Or is it for performance reasons? Any plans on supporting this in the future? What I'm considering is plugging in our own handler inside hci_event.c. We can do this inside some custom hardware - but we are trying to avoid this since we already have other custom hardware we need to do in our device which is a wireless access control system. Thanks, Shreesh --- On Sun, 7/18/10, Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [HCI Events] Connection Event Processing > To: "Shreesh Holla" <hshreesh@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-bluetooth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 1:02 AM > Hi Shreesh, > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010, Shreesh Holla wrote: > > I'm trying to build a handler for a project and > needed to process the > > Connection Request Event. > > I'm able to get that properly. But I tried > adding a "reject Connection" - > > command in the handler and invariably an "Accept > Connection" command is > > issued.This is what I can see from hcidump and > my event handling code. > > > > I need to override that. So where is this done? > In the Bluez library, > > bluetoothd > > > > or btusb? Or somewhere else? Or is there some other > kind of setup/hooks that > > needs to be modified to insert my own event > handler? > > > > Any help would be great here. > > The response to the connect request is more or less > hardcoded into the > hci_conn_request_evt function in net/bluetooth/hci_event.c. > There's a > patch[1] in the bluetooth-next-2.6 tree which adds > blacklist support, > but afaik it's only headed for 2.6.36. It's also only a > static list of > addresses to be rejected, so if you want something more > dynamic it wont > be of much help. > > Another way to avoid the kernel response to the connect > request is to > set the HCI device into RAW mode but then you also loose > all other > Bluetooth functionality provided by the kernel and > userspace (i.e. you'd > essentially need to implement a full host stack yourself). > > Johan > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/holtmann/bluetooth-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=a1e716eedbed0bac3e9b84b7f53de182e12345cb > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html