Hi Gustavo,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Gustavo F. Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work)
> int err;
>
> if (hdev->conn_hash.sco_num > 0) {
> - if (!data->did_iso_resume) {
> + if (!test_bit(BTUSB_DID_ISO_RESUME, &data->flags)) {
> err = usb_autopm_get_interface(data->isoc);
> if (err < 0) {
> clear_bit(BTUSB_ISOC_RUNNING, &data->flags);
> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static void btusb_work(struct work_struct *work)
> return;
> }
>
> - data->did_iso_resume = 1;
> + set_bit(BTUSB_DID_ISO_RESUME, &data->flags);
> }
> if (data->isoc_altsetting != 2) {
> clear_bit(BTUSB_ISOC_RUNNING, &data->flags);
Just wondering ... could test_and_set_bit() be used here (instead of
test_bit() + set_bit()) ?
Regards,
--
Anderson Lizardo
OpenBossa Labs - INdT
Manaus - Brazil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
