Hi Tom, On Mon, Jun 14, 2010, Counihan, Tom wrote: > Many thanks for the prompt response Johan, No problem :) > Not sure at all really. I had my suspicion, but wanted to start somewhere. > What you suggest makes perfect sense really - back to the drawing > board for me :$ - just need to figure out a logical home for this. Note that I'm not strictly saying that it can't be D-Bus based. Only that there's a considerable risk with that and that you should understand the pros and cons of the different alternatives. E.g. compared to D-Bus a library would restrict you more in terms of what programing languages can be used for the application whereas there's quite a plethora of D-Bus bindings out there. You'd also need to consider potential multithreading issues and pay close attention in designing the API so that it can be conveniently hooked up to whatever mainloop the application has, or then simply decide that only one mainloop, e.g. the glib one, is supported. > On an aside, could the same comment be made regarding PBAP re contact > pictures? Yes, I think so. Johan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
