Hi, El Monday 17 May 2010 18:06:58 Johan Hedberg escribió: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 13, 2010, Jose Antonio Santos Cadenas wrote: > > --- > > > > src/adapter.h | 5 +++++ > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/adapter.h b/src/adapter.h > > index 9b4ce10..8812ed8 100644 > > --- a/src/adapter.h > > +++ b/src/adapter.h > > @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ > > > > * > > */ > > > > +#ifndef __ADAPTER_H__ > > +#define __ADAPTER_H__ > > + > > > > #include <bluetooth/bluetooth.h> > > #include <dbus/dbus.h> > > #include <glib.h> > > > > @@ -183,3 +186,5 @@ struct btd_adapter_ops { > > > > int btd_register_adapter_ops(struct btd_adapter_ops *btd_adapter_ops); > > void btd_adapter_cleanup_ops(struct btd_adapter_ops *btd_adapter_ops); > > int adapter_ops_setup(void); > > > > + > > +#endif /* __ADAPTER_H__ */ > > Lack of these defines is actually intentional for headsers which aren't > part of any public library. The intention is to keep the header > dependencies simple and get errors as soon as there's a circular > dependency between them. Thank you for the response. I guess I have to review how I do the include :) > > Johan > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html