Hi Andrei,
* Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@xxxxxxxxx> [2010-05-14 18:39:40 +0300]:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a bug with race condition between l2cap tasklet and krfcomm process.
>
> When sending following sequence:
>
> ...
> No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
> 89 1.951202 RFCOMM Rcvd DISC DLCI=20
> 90 1.951324 RFCOMM Sent UA DLCI=20
> 91 1.959381 HCI_EVT Number of Completed Packets
> 92 1.966461 RFCOMM Rcvd DISC DLCI=0
> 93 1.966492 L2CAP Rcvd Disconnect Request
> 94 1.972595 L2CAP Sent Disconnect Response
>
> ...
>
> krfcommd kernel thread is preempted with l2cap tasklet which remove l2cap_conn
> (L2CAP connection handler structure). Then rfcomm thread tries to send RFCOMM
> UA which is reply to RFCOMM DISC and when de-referencing l2cap_conn crash
> happens.
>
> ...
> [ 694.175933] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 00000000
> [ 694.184936] pgd = c0004000
> [ 694.187683] [00000000] *pgd=00000000
> [ 694.191711] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT
> [ 694.196350] last sysfs file:
> /sys/devices/platform/hci_h4p/firmware/hci_h4p/loading
> [ 694.260375] CPU: 0 Not tainted (2.6.32.10 #1)
> [ 694.265106] PC is at l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x43c/0x73c [l2cap]
> [ 694.270721] LR is at 0xd7017303
> ...
> [ 694.525085] Backtrace:
> [ 694.527587] [<bf266be0>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x0/0x73c [l2cap])
> from [<c02f2cc8>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb8
> [ 694.537292] [<c02f2c10>] (sock_sendmsg+0x0/0xd8) from [<c02f3044>]
> (kernel_sendmsg+0x48/0x80)
> ...
>
> I have a patch which fixes the issue but not sure that there is no
> better way. Waiting for comments.
>
> Currently I am investigating possibility to:
> - implement l2cap_conn reference counting
sock_owned_by_user() gives the same effect as a ref count. See comments below.
> - use socket backlog queue to process l2cap packets later when socket is not
> owned by the process.
You actually don't need a backlog queue here. You can process the signal
packet, skipping the l2cap_chan_del() call;
> From 955a821e1ee66cd6f9717ea4a2e9b3dfdafdc22a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:56:39 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Check sk is not used before freeing
>
> Check that socket sk is not locked in user process before removing
> l2cap connection handler and sk.
>
> rfcomm kernel thread may be preempted with l2cap tasklet which remove l2cap_conn
> (L2CAP connection handler structure). Then rfcomm thread tries to send RFCOMM
> UA which is reply to RFCOMM DISC and when de-referencing l2cap_conn crash
> can happen.
>
> ...
> [ 694.175933] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
> [ 694.184936] pgd = c0004000
> [ 694.187683] [00000000] *pgd=00000000
> [ 694.191711] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT
> [ 694.196350] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/hci_h4p/firmware/hci_h4p/loading
> [ 694.260375] CPU: 0 Not tainted (2.6.32.10 #1)
> [ 694.265106] PC is at l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x43c/0x73c [l2cap]
> [ 694.270721] LR is at 0xd7017303
>
> ...
>
> [ 694.525085] Backtrace:
> [ 694.527587] [<bf266be0>] (l2cap_sock_sendmsg+0x0/0x73c [l2cap]) from [<c02f2cc8>] (sock_sendmsg+0xb8/0xd8)
> [ 694.537292] [<c02f2c10>] (sock_sendmsg+0x0/0xd8) from [<c02f3044>] (kernel_sendmsg+0x48/0x80)
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/bluetooth/l2cap.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> index bb00015..7eb9a58 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap.c
> @@ -3119,6 +3119,13 @@ static inline int l2cap_disconnect_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct l2cap_cmd
> if (!sk)
> return 0;
>
> + /* sk is locked in krfcomm process */
> + if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> + BT_DBG("sk %p is owned by user", sk);
> + bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> + return 0;
> + }
That's wrong. Use the sock_owned_by_user() only to avoid the
l2cap_chan_del() call, so you can process all the rest of the function
and send the Disconnect Response.
The same check should be added to l2cap_connect_rsp() and
l2cap_disconnect_rsp(), since they call l2cap_chan_del() under bh
context as well. ;)
> rsp.dcid = cpu_to_le16(l2cap_pi(sk)->scid);
> rsp.scid = cpu_to_le16(l2cap_pi(sk)->dcid);
> l2cap_send_cmd(conn, cmd->ident, L2CAP_DISCONN_RSP, sizeof(rsp), &rsp);
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
--
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://padovan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
