Hi, I'm packaging bluez-4.4 right now and just wanted to gather opinions about the package naming (it might be good if distributions could agree on consistent naming of packages). So how is everybody going to name the packages? The "old" ones for bluez-3.x were easy: - either bluez-libs or libbluetooth2 for the libs - bluez-utils for the hcid and hciconfig and related stuff - bluez-audio for the audio stuff (packaged separately because of the dependencies - bluez-cups for the cups backend >From a first glance, I'd just keep the package-naming as is, but since it is a major version update anyway, if we want to change it, now might be a good time ;-) Opinions, anyone? -- Stefan Seyfried R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html