Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: open code __blk_account_io_start()

[Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/27/23 4:12 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 12:34:26AM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> There is only one caller for __blk_account_io_start(), the function
>> is small enough to fit in its caller blk_account_io_start().
>>
>> Remove the function and opencode in the its caller
>> blk_account_io_start().
> 
> Having the account slow path in a separate function actually is nice,
> same for the next patch.

Then it should be made explicitly out-of-line, the compiler would've
inlined that anyway.

-- 
Jens Axboe